Today's paper: 83 stories · 395 sources

Every story, told six ways. You pick the side.

· Today's paper

Tech

Judge orders Meta to pay New Mexico $25B in Cambridge Analytica case

A jury found Meta liable for misleading users about privacy and content policies in a case tied to Cambridge Analytica's collection of Facebook data for 2016 political ads.

Who covered it

3 articles from rated outlets · 3 wire/unrated
  • Conspiracy left 0
  • Far left 0
  • Left 1
  • Right 1
  • Far right 1
  • Conspiracy right 0
  • Wire / unrated 3

Where readers stand

Readers: no picks yet

What we know

  • A judge in New Mexico ordered Meta Platforms to pay $25 billion on Wednesday.
  • A jury found Meta liable for more than 43 million violations of New Mexico's consumer protection laws.
  • New Mexico sued Meta in 2021 over Cambridge Analytica's collection of Facebook user data for political ads in the 2016 election.
  • New Mexico Attorney General Raúl Torrez said the payment would go toward public education after an expected appeals process.
  • Meta's lawyers argued the company should pay no more than $3.4 billion.
Summarised from 4 reports across 2 perspectives.

How it's being told

3 of 6 perspectives found in coverage

All six at a glance

Each side in depth

Left

Says Meta misled Facebook users for years

The Guardian US (Politics): Meta ordered to pay $25bn to New Mexico in Cambridge Analytica data-privacy case

No readers have picked a side yet. Shares show once 10 have.

The Guardian reports the judge found Meta's systematic misleading of consumers over years went to the heart of its business practices.

How they tell it · 1 article
Who's in this lane

Mainstream liberal outlets such as CNN, MSNBC, NPR and The Washington Post. Usually focuses on who is affected, climate, public institutions and criticism of the Trump administration.

The opposite side says

Right: Cites 43 million violations in Cambridge Analytica case

Right

Cites 43 million violations in Cambridge Analytica case

New York Post (Politics): Meta ordered to pay $25B to New Mexico in Cambridge Analytica scandal over user data in 2016 election

No readers have picked a side yet. Shares show once 10 have.

The New York Post reports the penalty follows a jury finding of 43 million violations of state consumer law in a case over data harvested for 2016 election ads.

How they tell it · 1 article
Who's in this lane

Mainstream conservative outlets such as Fox News, the Washington Examiner and the New York Post. Usually focuses on costs, security, government overreach and Democratic policy.

The opposite side says

Left: Says Meta misled Facebook users for years

Far right

Calls the $25B penalty a data privacy ruling

The Gateway Pundit: JUST IN: Meta Ordered to Pay $25 Billion Penalty for Misleading Facebook Users About Data Privacy

No readers have picked a side yet. Shares show once 10 have.

Far-right outlets frame the judgment as a $25 billion penalty against Meta for misleading Facebook users about data privacy in the Cambridge Analytica matter.

How they tell it · 1 article
Who's in this lane

Hard-right outlets such as Breitbart, Newsmax and The Gateway Pundit. Usually focuses on national strength, immigration, distrust of institutions and strong support for Trump.

The opposite side says

No far left coverage found for this story.

Where readers stand

Consp. LFar leftLeftRightFar rightConsp. R

0 readers picked a side. They sit near the centre.

0 visitors without an account picked a side. Counted separately, not in the readers above.

Pick a side

Full coverage

6 articles from 6 outlets

Grouped left to right; wires and unrated outlets sit in the middle.

The debate

Should Meta pay $25 billion to New Mexico in the Cambridge Analytica case?

Debate

0 comments

Sign up to join the debate. Reading is free.

No comments yet. Be the first to make your case.