Today's paper: 114 stories · 533 sources

Every story, told six ways. You pick the side.

· Today's paper

Ongoing storyline

New Hampshire student ID voting

Get a notification when this storyline has a new story.

What's happening

The Supreme Court said student IDs cannot be used for voting in New Hampshire's midterm elections, granting an emergency request filed by the state that was backed by the Republican National Committee.(source: Oct 22: Supreme Court allows New Hampshire to fully ban student IDs for voting) The brief unsigned order said a federal judge should not have ordered a change to voting rules so close to the Nov. 3 election, and Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson was the sole dissenter.(source: Oct 22: Supreme Court allows New Hampshire to fully ban student IDs for voting)

How we got here

  1. A state law enacted in April removed student IDs from the list of identification election officials would accept when someone requests a ballot.(source: Oct 22: Supreme Court allows New Hampshire to fully ban student IDs for voting)
  2. The case stemmed from a law passed by the Republican-controlled state legislature earlier this year that prohibited student identification cards from being used to register to vote or receive a ballot for the Nov. 3 election.(source: Oct 23: Jackson Dissents as Supreme Court Allows New Hampshire Student ID Voting Limits)
  3. Voting advocacy groups sued, arguing the restrictions were unconstitutional and discriminated against young voters.(source: Oct 23: Jackson Dissents as Supreme Court Allows New Hampshire Student ID Voting Limits)
  4. The Supreme Court on Thursday said student IDs cannot be used for voting in New Hampshire's midterm elections, granting an emergency request filed by the state with the backing of the Republican National Committee.(source: Oct 22: Supreme Court allows New Hampshire to fully ban student IDs for voting)
  5. Jackson publicly dissented from the Thursday order, while other justices cited the longstanding precedent that lower federal courts should ordinarily not alter election rules on the eve of an election.(source: Oct 23: Jackson Dissents as Supreme Court Allows New Hampshire Student ID Voting Limits)

Summary of our earlier coverage: every sentence links to the stories it comes from, numbered as in the timeline below.

Timeline

Oldest first

How each side's framing changed

Each side's frame, story by story
Side1Supreme Court allows New Hampshire to fully ban student IDs for voting2Jackson Dissents as Supreme Court Allows New Hampshire Student ID Voting Limits
Conspiracy leftNo coverageNo coverage
Far leftNo coverageNo coverage
LeftNotes the ruling is a win for RepublicansNBC News (Politics)No coverage
RightNo coverageSays Jackson broke with the Supreme CourtFox News (Politics)
Far rightPraises closing the student ID loopholeThe FederalistSays Jackson broke with fellow justicesBreitbart (Politics)
Conspiracy rightSays court backed New Hampshire on student IDsZeroHedgeNo coverage
ReadersReaders: no picks yetReaders: no picks yet

Debate questions over time

  1. Should New Hampshire be allowed to ban student IDs as a form of voter identification in the midterm elections?

    Join the debate on Supreme Court allows New Hampshire to fully ban student IDs for voting
  2. Should New Hampshire allow voters to use student ID cards in the midterm elections?

    Join the debate on Jackson Dissents as Supreme Court Allows New Hampshire Student ID Voting Limits