Home › Politics › El-Sayed family ties scrutiny What's happening Republican Mike Rogers and Democrat Abdul El-Sayed met in their second and final Michigan Senate debate in Detroit, where Rogers said El-Sayed has ties to the Muslim Brotherhood and asked whether he is for America or terrorist groups overseas.3 (source: story 3, Oct 21)
Summary of our earlier coverage. Numbers link to the stories.
Dive deeper → into the El-Sayed family ties scrutiny storyline
Who covered it 4 articles from rated outlets · 0 wire/unrated R 3 FR 1 Conspiracy left 0 Far left 0 Left 0 Right 3 Far right 1 Conspiracy right 0 Wire / unrated 0
Where readers stand Readers: no picks yet What we know Michigan Democratic Senate candidate Abdul El-Sayed confirmed that his sister-in-law, Mariam Jukaku, was on the federal terrorist watchlist. The watchlist is officially known as the Terrorist Screening Dataset. Jukaku was a plaintiff in a 2016 lawsuit challenging her placement on the list. El-Sayed said Jukaku did nothing wrong and was removed from the list after suing. El-Sayed is scheduled to campaign with former President Barack Obama. Summarised from 3 reports across 2 perspectives.
How it's being told 2 of 6 perspectives found in coverage
All six at a glance Conspiracy left No coverage Far left No coverage Left No coverage Right · 3 articles Says El-Sayed defended sister-in-law on watchlist Fox News (Politics) +2 more Read this side ↓ Far right · 1 article Calls El-Sayed's watchlist admission a problem Breitbart (Politics) Read this side ↓ Conspiracy right No coverage
Each side in depth Consp. L No coverage Far left No coverage Left No coverage Right Far right Consp. R No coverage
Right
Says El-Sayed defended sister-in-law on watchlist Fox News (Politics): Michigan Democrat confirms sister-in-law's terror watchlist lawsuit days before Obama campaign appearance No readers have picked a side yet. Shares show once 10 have.
Right-leaning outlets report that El-Sayed acknowledged his sister-in-law's watchlist history and defended her while blaming his GOP rival.
How they tell it · 3 articles Who's in this lane Mainstream conservative outlets such as Fox News, the Washington Examiner and the New York Post. Usually focuses on costs, security, government overreach and Democratic policy.
The opposite side says No left coverage found for this story.
I'm with this side Far right
Calls El-Sayed's watchlist admission a problem Breitbart (Politics): WATCH: El-Sayed Admits His Sister-in-Law Was on Terrorist Watch List During Obama Administration No readers have picked a side yet. Shares show once 10 have.
Far-right outlets frame El-Sayed's confirmation as a damaging admission and stress the Obama administration's role in the watchlist placement.
How they tell it · 1 article Who's in this lane Hard-right outlets such as Breitbart, Newsmax and The Gateway Pundit. Usually focuses on national strength, immigration, distrust of institutions and strong support for Trump.
The opposite side says No far left coverage found for this story.
I'm with this side ‹ ›
Where readers stand
Consp. L Far left Left Right Far right Consp. R
0 readers picked a side. They sit near the centre.
0 visitors without an account picked a side. Counted separately, not in the readers above.
Pick a side
Full coverage 4 articles from 4 outlets Grouped left to right; wires and unrated outlets sit in the middle.
The debate
Should the federal terrorist watchlist be reformed?
Debate 0 comments Sign up to join the debate. Reading is free.
Sign up
Best Bridging Hot New Old
All 0 Consp. L 0 Far left 0 Left 0 Right 0 Far right 0 Consp. R 0
Any stance For Against
No comments yet. Be the first to make your case.
What's happening Republican Mike Rogers and Democrat Abdul El-Sayed met in their second and final Michigan Senate debate in Detroit, where Rogers said El-Sayed has ties to the Muslim Brotherhood and asked whether he is for America or terrorist groups overseas.3 (source: story 3, Oct 21)
Summary of our earlier coverage. Numbers link to the stories.
Dive deeper → into the El-Sayed family ties scrutiny storyline Where readers stand
Consp. L Far left Left Right Far right Consp. R
0 readers picked a side. They sit near the centre.
0 visitors without an account picked a side. Counted separately, not in the readers above.
Pick a side